|
|
Database updates
Judgments
Katta Surendera vs State of Andhra Pradesh
[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, 13 Jun 2008]
Indian Penal Code, 1860, s. 302 - Whether single blow amounts to offence covered u/s. 302 IPC, 1860? - Held, burden is on the accused to show that he had a right of private defence which extended to causing of death - It cannot be laid down as a rule of universal application that whenever a single blow is given application of s. 302 IPC is ruled out; it would depend upon several factors - Appeal allowed.
|
G. Krishna Murthy, Tiruchanur Village, District Chittoor vs Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented By Its Principal Secretary, Department of Panchayat Raj, Secretariat, Hyderabad and 4 Others
[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT, 10 Jun 2008]
The Order of the Court was as follows :1. Tiruchanur village, popularly known as Alimelumangapuram, is a major Gram Panchayat in Chittoor district and abode of Goddess Padmavathi @ Alimelumanga, the divine consort of Lord Venkateswara Swamy, known
|
R. Mallaiah and Others vs Deputy Inspector General, Nizamabad and Medak District Range, Nizamabad, Nizamabad District and Others
[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT, 14 May 2008]
The Order of the Court was as follows :In this writ petition, the petitioners sought for issue of a Writ of Mandamus to declare the registration of First Information Report (for short, 'the FIR') in Crime No.82 of 2008 of Gajwel Police Station,
|
Crips Laboratories Limited (In Liquidation), Represented By Official Liquidator vs High Court of Andhra Pradesh Hyderabad
[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT, 02 May 2008]
The Order of the Court was as follows :The questions which arise for consideration, in this application, are(1) Whether the sum available, from the sale proceeds of the security of a secured creditor, after meeting the principal dues of the secured
|
Seelam Ramadevi vs Gadiraju Yanadi Raju
[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT, 02 May 2008]
The Order of the Court was as follows :This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 6.12.2007 in E.A.No.187 of 2007 in E.P.No.17 of 2007 in O.S.No.223 of 2004 on the file of the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Rajampet.The
|
Gajula Exim Private Limited, Visakhapatnam vs Authorised Officer, Andhra Bank, Main Branch, District Visakhapatnam and 2 Others
[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT, 02 May 2008]
The Order of the Court was as follows :1. This is a revision petition filed by the petitioner in S.A. No.25 of 2006 on the file of the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Visakhapatnam, challenging the order dated 13-09-2007 passed by the said Tribunal.2. The
|
Andhra Bank, Tanuku, Represented By Its Branch Manager vs State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented By Collector, West Godavari, Eluru and Another
[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT, 01 May 2008]
The Order of the Court was as follows :The success of the State of Andhra Pradesh in O.S. No.58 of 1985 on the file of the Subordinate Judge's Court, Bhimavaram by being granted a decree for Rs.23, 99, 720-88 ps. with costs and subsequent interest
|
Yashwitha Constructions Private Limited, Represented By Its Managing Director M.Promod Mumar Reddy, Chennai vs Simplex Concrete Piles India Limited, Rep. By Its Managing Director, Kolkata
[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT, 01 May 2008]
The Order of the Court was as follows :This application is filed, under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996A32n.xml, seeking appointment of a retired Judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court, or a technically qualified
|
Gampa Govindu vs State of Andhra Pradesh through Public Prosecutor
[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, 21 Apr 2008]
Indian Penal Code, s. 326 - Trial Court convicted the sole appellant under s. 326 - High Court in revision set aside conviction and sentence under s. 326 and appellant has been convicted under s. 324 - Held, joint petition of compromise has been filed wherein it has been stated that the parties have settled their disputes; as such, they be permitted to compound the offence - Prayer is just and must be granted - Appeal allowed.
|
K.Ashok Kumar Reddy vs State of Andhara Pradesh, Through P.P
[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT, 18 Apr 2008]
The Order of the Court was as follows :1. This criminal appeal is directed against the judgment dated 13.01.2004 passed in Sessions Case No.335 of 2002 on the file of IV Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, whereby and whereunder the
|
Alli Iylaiah vs Alli Rajalaxmi and Others
[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT, 11 Apr 2008]
The Order of the Court was as follows :This revision raises an important question, in relation to interpretation of Section 15 of the Limitation Act, 196302802.xml (for short 'the Act'). The proceedings, between the parties herein, have a chequered
|
Mohammad Jani Basha vs Mitra Tabacco Products, Lease Holders of Langar Cigars Company, Through Its Managing Partner, Nellore and Another
[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT, 09 Apr 2008]
The Order of the Court was as follows :Petitioner filed I.D.No.278 of 2000, in the Labour Court, Guntur, under Section 2-A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 194702678.xml (for short "the ID Act"). He stated that he was employed as a clerk in the
|
Andhra Sugars Limited, Through Its General Manager (Hrd) and Others vs Labour Court, Guntur, Through Its Presiding Officer and Others
[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT, 09 Apr 2008]
The Order of the Court was as follows :These writ petitions arise under similar set of circumstances. Awards passed in I.D.Nos.234, 235 and 236 of 1999, by the Labour Court, Guntur; are challenged in the respective writ petitions. For the sake of
|
Surampudi Sudarsana Rao vs Nanduri Venkata Seetha Ramanjaneyulu and Four Others
[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT, 04 Apr 2008]
The Order of the Court was as follows :1. Heard the learned counsel on record.2. This Court on 22.6.1998 made the following order:"Admit in view of the substantial questions of law raised in ground Nos.1 to 7 of Memorandum of Grounds Appeal.
|
V. Sreenivasa Rao and Others vs Authority Under Sec.17(1) of Working Journalists and Others News Paper Employees (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 and Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Hyderabad and Another
[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT, 01 Apr 2008]
The Order of the Court was as follows :The petitioners claim that they worked in different capacities with the 2nd respondent, till they retired under Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) in the year 2005. Stating that the wages paid to them for
|
Parakh Foods Limited vs State of Andhra Pradesh and Another
[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, 27 Mar 2008]
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Misbranding - Allegation that label contains pictures of vegetables like cabbage, carrot, brinjal, capsicum, cauliflower, tomato and onions and High Court has held that from the evidence on record the article of food in question, is soyabean oil - Appeal against - Held, vegetables shown on the label of soyabean oil does not in any way indicate that the quality of soyabean oil is 'super-refined', 'extra- refined', 'micro-refined', 'double-refined', 'ultra-refined', 'anti- cholesterol', 'cholesterol fighter', 'soothing to heart', 'cholesterol friendly', 'saturated fat free' etc., nor it indicates the exaggeration towards the quality of the product to come within the mischief of r. 37D of the PFA Rules - High Court has committed a serious error in arriving at a finding that the article of food (soyabean oil) was misbranded - Appeal allowed.
|
M.A. Sattar and Others vs State of Andhra Pradesh
[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, 26 Mar 2008]
Indian Penal Code, ss. 302 r/w 34, 302 r/w 109 - Appeal against conviction and sentence - Held, First Information Report had been recorded within a very short time of the incident in which full details of the incident had been given - No reason whatsoever to doubt the presence of the eye witnesses - PW 1 is the first informant and PW 4 figures in the report - Appeals dismissed.
|
Golla Yelugu Govindu vs State of Andhra Pradesh
[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, 26 Mar 2008]
Indian Penal Code, 1860, s. 302 - Appeal against conviction - Held, though it is an established principle that child witnesses are dangerous witnesses as they are pliable and liable to be influenced easily, shaped and moulded, but it is also an accepted norm that if after careful scrutiny of their evidence the Court comes to the conclusion that there is an impress of truth in it, there is no obstacle in the way of accepting the evidence of a child witness - Appropriate conviction would be under s. 304 Part I - Appeal partly allowed.
|
Bavisetti Kameswara Rao @ Babai vs State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented By Its Public Prosecutor High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad
[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, 25 Mar 2008]
Indian Penal Code, s. 302 - Appeal against conviction and sentence - Held, when the screw driver was plunged into the vital part of the body of the deceased, it cut his liver and spleen - This was a case where the act was done with intention of causing bodily injury and the body injury intended to be inflicted is sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death, covered by 'Thirdly' of s. 300 - This is not the case where conviction could be for the offence committed under s. 304 Part II - Appeal dismissed.
|
Incable Net (Andhra) Limited and Others vs Apaksh Broadband Limited and Others
[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT, 18 Mar 2008]
The Judgment was delivered by : V. V. S. RAO1. The appellants herein (hereafter "the petitioners") filed company petition being C. P. No. 69 of 2006, before the Company Law Board (CLB), Additional Principal Bench, Chennai. It was unde- sections 397,
|
Retired Employees Association vs Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented By Principle. Secretary, Women's Development Child Welfare and Labour (Lab.I) Department, Hyderabad and 4 Others
[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT, 13 Mar 2008]
The Order of the Court was as follows :The dispute which the petitioner Association seeks a reference, to the Industrial Tribunal for its adjudication, is their demand for extension of pensionary benefits to their members, all of whom retired from
|
Saipriya Estates, Represented By Its Managing Partner, N.Ram Mohan Reddy, Hyderabad vs V.V.L.Sujatha and Another
[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT, 13 Mar 2008]
The Order of the Court was as follows :This Writ Petition is filed for a Writ of Prohibition to prohibit the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-III, Hyderabad (for short "the District Forum") from entertaining C.C.No.1026 of 2007 and to
|
Annam Malla Reddy vs Bangi Nagaiah and 2 Others
[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT, 05 Mar 2008]
The Order of the Court was as follows :1. This Revision Petition has been preferred by the defendant/Appellant in A.S.No.3 of 1996 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Huzurabad.2. The plaintiffs filed the suit for partition of the suit schedule
|
N. Lakshmi and Another vs Government of Andhra Pradesh and Others
[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, 04 Mar 2008]
Division Bench of the High Court relying on earlier orders passed in other matters dismissed all these matters - Appeal against - Held, several other questions were also raised which were not the subject matter of earlier group and were not agitated in those matters and were not answered one way or the other by the Court raised in these matters - Remitted the matters for fresh disposal.
|
Prakash Rao vs Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Hyderabad Twin Cities and Others
[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT, 04 Mar 2008]
The Order of the Court was as follows :In these two Writ Petitions, similar questions fall for consideration, though one arises out of an appeal preferred under the provisions of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 197201671.xml (for short "the Gratuity
|
|